Logo

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

08.06.2025 06:50

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

PC: Google

PC: Google

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

Is the Donald Trump Bible any different from a regular Bible? Has Trump altered its contents?

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

Gold Holds Decline After US Jobs Data Deters Demand for Havens - Bloomberg

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

Are there any queer Space Marine Legion in Warhammer 30k or 40k?

PC: Google…my precious!

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

If my lovely sister sleeps with my boyfriend, what should I do about her?

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

Wicked: For Good trailer transports fans back to Oz - BBC

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

S.A.-area rabies cases spark concern for officials. Here's why - MySA

Have the ability to visualize:

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

Would you respect the US with a woman as president?

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

Because reading is WORK. Period.

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

What is an easy way to get your driver's license?

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

Netflix and chill is a thing:

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

How do people break a narcissist man's ego?

Entertainment.

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

Is the 4B movement's aggressiveness against men for seeing women as mantelpieces valid?

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

Wrongly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia returning to U.S. to face criminal charges - Axios

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

PC: Google

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

Many if not most, are in this category.

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

PC: The Guardian

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

PC: Google

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

There are some books that just…suck!

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

Actually have some literary skill: